5012MHN Assessing Needs And Planning Care Across The Lifespan


Taking care of the mental health patient is one of the demanding and important profession as the healthcare professional need to take care of a lot of things because even a small mistake can mentally affect the patient or the patient might do something (Ajnakina et al., 2017). This assignment includes developing a patient care plan regarding a patient experiencing paranoia, Depression And Hearing Voices. This assignment will include all the aspects of learning outcomes which includes focusing upon building association with family and friends to provide holistic care to patient and describe the various aspects of a decision-making process.

Don’t use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
5012MHN Assessing Needs And Planning Care Across The Lifespan
Just from $8/Page
Order Essay

Background Of Case

This case study is regarding a patient named Martin who is 41 and have distressing feelings from past 20 years. He explained that he had been hearing voices and feelings like people are talking about him and often have suicidal thoughts. His medical history explains that he has issues with gaining weight and also has asthma. As he is not able to react properly in public because of the hearing voices, and suicidal thoughts, he avoids talking to anyone and going out with a fear of what people might think about him but still have some friends. The work history is also not good as he is trying hard to get a job but is not able to.

At present, he lives with his parents and two sisters in Leicester. The patient did not show very good interests or coping skills but recalls memory from childhood regarding living with parents and grandparents. Since the age of 15, he has been experiencing mental or physical issues which restrained his interest or excitement in the work. In between all these, he has a habit of alcohol drinking as he believes that it gives pleasure and happiness. The other issues associated with the patient is poor family health history such as mother experiencing heart issues and mother and father with depression along with insomnia.

Case Presentation

Various issues presented by the client explains that he is suffering from psychotic depression which is a type of depression but is accompanied by psychosis.  People with psychotic depression experience higher death rates than everyone (Aref-Adib et al., 2016). These high paces of constant clinical sickness among people with dysfunctional behaviour might be set off because of various issues, including way of life factors, and many others (as in the case of Martin). General clinical benefits might can possibly further develop wellbeing results among people with psychological issues. Concerning psychosis, different professionals explained the importance of collaborating with psychological well-being providers as a team with other healthcare professionals (Nordentoft, Madsen & Fedyszyn, 2015). Subsequently, distinguishing and evaluating levels of admittance to clinical consideration and saw boundaries to access among people with genuine psychological sickness would be critical for presenting the advancement regarding intercessions to improve wellbeing of individual.

Despite the fact that there is a significant similarity on the nature of administration got by people with dysfunctional behaviour who access care, there is less population-based research about people with genuine psychological sickness and their admittance to clinical benefits (Beck et al., 2019). Various investigations in past thirty years have portrayed psychotic significant depression which is likewise being said to as a subtype of significant depression which is joined by hallucinations or other psychotic elements. Proof from phenomenological and neurobiological examinations shows that this is a novel disorder with clinical and natural qualities that are unmistakable from those of nonpsychotic depression and from other psychotic disorders (Malla et al., 2016). Treatment studies have given proof of little self-influenced consequences and great reactions to treatment in addition to an antipsychotic specialist. Be that as it may, there are a couple of little, imminent, twofold visually impaired, controlled preliminaries examining the adequacy of energizer antipsychotic mix pharmacotherapy. Yet this establishes the presently acknowledged and generally all-around applied norm of care’ for psychotic depression (Sheffield, Karcher & Barch, 2018). Treatment rules have been founded generally on uncontrolled examinations of electroconvulsive treatment and studies utilizing tricyclic antidepressants and original antipsychotic drugs, which are not regularly picked as first-line specialists today due to worries with respect to decency and risks.

The issue of a long span of untreated psychosis has been all around tended to in different writing. In general, the treatment time is 1-2 years (Lenka et al., 2017). Treatment delays are connected with type of side effects, reaction to treatment, and some others. Untreated psychosis can cause critical harm to individual’s quality of life. Obviously one of the objectives of early intercession programs which is initiated by public, global and private associations is to lessen the time of untreated psychosis (Lacan, Sheridan & Bowie, 2020). In any case, examination has inspected the particular pathways to mind experienced by people with a first-episode of psychosis, and information about help looking for endeavours made by these people is meagre. Some exploration has been pointed toward recognizing the pathways to really focus on broad emotional well-being concerns.

Local area information, and misjudgement of the significance of early mediation on course of ailment among people in general and general wellbeing specialists. Understanding the boundaries to really focus on people and families managing a rising psychosis interestingly may empower clinicians to apply new information to a few key inquiries. Investigating the early pathways prompts an assessment of the unique circumstance and experience of looking for and getting help. This approach could furnish clinicians and experts with ground breaking thoughts for focusing on wellbeing advancement exercises and expert preparation (Law et al., 2016). Effectively gaining from the encounters of individuals who require treatment interestingly may help specialist co-ops and strategy producers inside psychiatry to intentionally get ready for more apparent, useful and for the most part useful doors and pathways to psychological wellness administrations. Individuals who fostered a psychological disorder during the subsequent stretch were similarly prone to counsel a non-therapist doctor for their emotional well-being issues as to counsel a psychological wellness subject matter expert (Bay et al., 2016). Those with serious psychological sickness didn’t vary from a less seriously sick gathering being used of out-patient administrations. They were, nonetheless, substantially more prone to use in-patient administrations.

Although, any examinations have analysed the particular way that people encountering a first episode of psychosis use to get to treatment (Farrelly et al., 2016). Analysing such pathways could be a beginning stage to foster better early recognition methodologies. Factors that appear to be connected with delay incorporate the absence of vital abilities of family specialists to perceive psychotic sickness and a deficient reaction by experts to psychotic diseases. A few examinations have analysed the sorts of side effects that might prompt early intercession however the outcomes are conflicting.

Different elements that might affect delay in treatment procedure incorporate issue seriousness, the people’s affinity to look for help, and administrations. Patients and their families might be hesitant to look for help for a scope of reasons. They might reject that there is an issue or think that maybe it can get better all alone (Sin  et al., 2016). They might need information about dysfunctional behaviour or the assets accessible for help. In the UK, one of the review inspected admittance to the medical clinic framework for people with a first-episode of psychosis according to the family’s point of view (Slade et al., 2015). They detailed that family members felt that administrations were not accessible when required, which constrained them to make numerous contacts frequently falling back on uncommon assist looking for endeavours when more standard contacts neglected to with giving treatment. In a small report by specific scientists made a normal assistance looking for endeavours preceding getting treatment. The major way of behaving was probably going to bring about effective treatment, as were contacts made by relatives to medical care experts. Various study demonstrates that possible hindrances to treatment incorporated an error of the reality of side effects, vulnerability of where to look for help, and stress over disgrace and marking (Switzer & Harper, 2019). In the most extensive investigation of pathways to mind in psychosis to date, one scientist distinguished pathways and boundaries to mind in 62 people who had encountered a first episode of psychosis. Members were asked to whom they went for help and the outcome of these endeavours (Si Lucksted  et al., 2018). Delay happened both from the hour of ailment beginning to contact and from contact to suitable treatment. The treatment effectiveness is also dependent as certain people got insufficient assistance locally, the quantity of weeks between first side effects and treatment in a program was 58 weeks. Hence, certain individuals experienced moderately lengthy pathways and it was not satisfactory why this was so.

Studies demonstrated that family experts possibly played a vital part in recognizing the signs and side effects of psychological sickness, since a large number of the underlying assistance looking for endeavours were made to family specialists. An expected half of people were psychotic when that they initially looked for help and half additionally revealed self-destructive ideation during the endeavour to get to treatment (Pelizza et al., 2019). People showed an overall movement from contact with non-mental normally family specialists to mental administrations, as well as from patient-started contact to family or companion started contact.

Further as there are various health issues ongoing in the family, it is also important for the healthcare professionals to look upon the triggers and symptoms which are associated with the same as there are high chances that Martin might get diagnosed with the same in future. This is to make sure that there are no more complications in his health which can have the ability to deteriorate his health condition. For addressing this, help of family doctor or psychologist can also be taken who can help to analyse the triggers or effective measures which can reduce the chance of developing any such condition which was prevailed in the family (Switzer & Harpe, 2019). Further, it is also important to involve family in the process of care of martin so that they are well aware regarding the issues faced by him and what can be their role to reduce the negative effects. They should also have adequate information regarding whom to consult in case of emergency and how to calm down the patient.

Some of the barrier to care discussed in various studies were absence of local area information, and error of the significance of early intercession on course of disease among people in general and general wellbeing specialists (de Toffol et al., 2018). Understanding the boundaries to really focus on people and families managing an emanant psychosis interestingly may empower clinicians to apply new information to a few key inquiries.  Investigating the geology of the early pathways prompts an assessment of the unique circumstance and experience of looking for and getting help. This approach could give clinicians and experts ground-breaking thoughts for focusing on wellbeing advancement exercises and expert preparation (Lenka et al., 2018). Effectively gaining from the encounters of individuals who require treatment interestingly may help specialist organizations and strategy producers inside psychiatry to deliberately get ready for more noticeable, useful and for the most part solid doors and pathways to psychological well-being administrations. The mental health policy of United Kingdom promotes the rights associated with a mental health care patient and the appropriate measures which is associated with healthcare professional providing the care.

Case Formulation
Problem List

The various issues which have been experienced by patient is depression, hearing various voices, psychotic condition. Moreover, the patient complained that he has suicidal thoughts which is by cutting off his throat or wrist.

Activating Events/Triggers

The trigger factor is consumption of alcohol and not getting involved in community activities as these helps to relax the mood. Further there are also not much good friends as he does not get involved or talk too much people.

Origins Of The Condition

The origin can be his health condition along with family health condition that is prevalence of depression (sister and father).

Treatment Goals

The major goal is to reduce suicidal thoughts and encourage community interaction which will help with the depression.

Predicted Obstacles To Treatment

Mental health as he is not much interactive so it will be hard for the people to get involved and build a therapeutic communication with him.

Protective Factors/Strengths

Strength is his understanding regarding his health condition and his will that he wants to bring improvement in his health.

Person Centred Care

To give the best treatment for psychosis, it is progressively contended that assistance clients themselves ought to be counselled to decide the treatment results they, when all is said and done, focus on and the components of treatment they see as generally supportive (Law et al., 2016). This might be especially significant in light of the fact that there are regularly critical contrasts between the needs of administration clients and the experts treating them. Conventional biomedical ways to deal with psychosis have been concerned fundamentally with positive maniacal side effects and biopharmaceutical therapy as vital to examination into and therapy of psychosis. This customary arrangement is progressively being tested, both by psychological well-being experts and by administration clients. themselves. Albeit positive side effects of psychosis might be upsetting for some assistance clients looking for treatment, positive side effects are not continuously troubling and are not generally the essential worry of all help clients (Bonnín et al., 2019). A wide scope of lived encounters and mental hardships are reliably found to impact the development and upkeep of psychosis.

For instance, truly challenging or horrible youth encounters are frequently revealed by administration clients, as are negative self-ideas and unfortunate confidence. Psychosocial factors instead of psychopathological side effects might influence administration clients’ abstract personal satisfaction, and sociocultural circumstances, for example, monetary, instructive, or professional status, or geological area seem to impact the drawn-out course of maniacal encounters (Bay et al., 2016). While evoking administration clients’ own inclinations and needs for treatment and result, it will be essential to perceive that, for some, tending to any of the variables referenced above might be as or more vital to them than looking for decreases in certain maniacal side effects.

Administration clients might require assist with uneasiness or despondency, or medication or liquor issues, monetary hardship or vagrancy, before they can connect seriously with treatment pointed explicitly at diminishing positive side effects. This supports the need to give more prominent thought to support clients’ singular necessities, and to their own needs and inclinations while leading examination and giving proficient assistance. In corresponding with calls for social skill among dementia professionals is an idea that what is required among specialists is responsiveness. Notwithstanding, it isn’t generally clear with regards to what this applies or means (Sin et al., 2016). For instance, regarding a person’s way of life, convictions and singularity is frequently distinguished as essential to skill and awareness among experts yet in addition as a sign of a quality assistance. This applies obviously to all individuals with dementia, in addition to those from ethnic minority foundations, albeit the vulnerability about answering them is a matter that needs inescapable improvement if person-focused care is most important factor in healthcare.  As in learning inability administrations, where their improvement has been addressed, it is possible that the central point of contention is the nature of the standard administrations (Malla et al., 2016). Expert administrations will keep on being required and upheld assuming administrations are cold hearted or bigot and assuming that staff need certainty that they can resolve issues of language, otherworldliness, person care and diet fittingly.


Person centred care is an important aspect while providing treatment to a mental health patient as they already are facing a number of health issues. This is to improve their involvement in care process and build their self-confidence. The major issue which has been observed in case of patient in this assignment is psychosis along with various episodes of depression. Along with, taking care of patient and addressing the barriers, it is also important that patient should be well aware regarding their condition so that any such condition where they can harm themselves or others can be avoided. This also includes collaborating with family to provide care as they are close with the patient and are more able to analyse the changes in behaviour. With the collaboration of family, close look at the improvement or deterioration in health of patient can be analysed and further addressed.  


Ajnakina, O., Morgan, C., Gayer-Anderson, C., Oduola, S., Bourque, F., Bramley, S., … & David, A. S. (2017). Only a small proportion of patients with first episode psychosis come via prodromal services: a retrospective survey of a large UK mental health programme. BMC psychiatry, 17(1), 1-9.

Aref-Adib, G., O’Hanlon, P., Fullarton, K., Morant, N., Sommerlad, A., Johnson, S., & Osborn, D. (2016). A qualitative study of online mental health information seeking behaviour by those with psychosis. BMC psychiatry, 16(1), 1-10.

Bay, N., Bjørnestad, J., Johannessen, J. O., Larsen, T. K., & Joa, I. (2016). Obstacles to care in first?episode psychosis patients with a long duration of untreated psychosis. Early intervention in psychiatry, 10(1), 71-76.

Beck, K., Andreou, C., Studerus, E., Heitz, U., Ittig, S., Leanza, L., & Riecher-Roessler, A. (2019). Clinical and functional long-term outcome of patients at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis without transition to psychosis: A systematic review. Schizophrenia Research, 210, 39-47.

Bonnín, C. M., Jiménez, E., Solé, B., Torrent, C., Radua, J., Reinares, M., … & Vieta, E. (2019). Lifetime psychotic symptoms, subthreshold depression and cognitive impairment as barriers to functional recovery in patients with bipolar disorder. Journal of clinical medicine, 8(7), 1046.

de Toffol, B., Trimble, M., Hesdorffer, D. C., Taylor, L., Sachdev, P., Clancy, M., … & Kanemoto, K. (2018). Pharmacotherapy in patients with epilepsy and psychosis. Epilepsy & Behavior, 88, 54-60.

Farrelly, S., Lester, H., Rose, D., Birchwood, M., Marshall, M., Waheed, W., … & Thornicroft, G. (2016). Barriers to shared decision making in mental health care: qualitative study of the Joint Crisis Plan for psychosis. Health Expectations, 19(2), 448-458.

Lacan, J., Sheridan, A., & Bowie, M. (2020). On a question preliminary to any possible treatment of psychosis. In Écrits (pp. 198-249). Routledge.

Law, H., Shryane, N., Bentall, R. P., & Morrison, A. P. (2016). Longitudinal predictors of subjective recovery in psychosis. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 209(1), 48-53.

Lenka, A., Hegde, S., Arumugham, S. S., & Pal, P. K. (2017). Pattern of cognitive impairment in patients with Parkinson’s disease and psychosis: a critical review. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, 37, 11-18.

Lucksted, A., Stevenson, J., Nossel, I., Drapalski, A., Piscitelli, S., & Dixon, L. B. (2018). Family member engagement with early psychosis specialty care. Early intervention in psychiatry, 12(5), 922-927.care

Malla, A., Iyer, S., McGorry, P., Cannon, M., Coughlan, H., Singh, S., … & Joober, R. (2016). From early intervention in psychosis to youth mental health reform: a review of the evolution and transformation of mental health services for young people. Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 51(3), 319-326.

Nordentoft, M., Madsen, T., & Fedyszyn, I. (2015). Suicidal behavior and mortality in first-episode psychosis. The Journal of nervous and mental disease, 203(5), 387-392.

Pelizza, L., Azzali, S., Paterlini, F., Garlassi, S., Scazza, I., Chiri, L. R., … & Raballo, A. (2019). The “Reggio Emilia At?Risk Mental States” program: A diffused,“liquid” model of early intervention in psychosis implemented in an Italian Department of Mental Health. Early Intervention in Psychiatry, 13(6), 1513-1524.

Sheffield, J. M., Karcher, N. R., & Barch, D. M. (2018). Cognitive deficits in psychotic disorders: a lifespan perspective. Neuropsychology review, 28(4), 509-533.

Sin, J., Murrells, T., Spain, D., Norman, I., & Henderson, C. (2016). Wellbeing, mental health knowledge and caregiving experiences of siblings of people with psychosis, compared to their peers and parents: an exploratory study. Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 51(9), 1247-1255.

Slade, M., Bird, V., Clarke, E., Le Boutillier, C., McCrone, P., Macpherson, R., … & Leamy, M. (2015). Supporting recovery in patients with psychosis through care by community-based adult mental health teams (REFOCUS): a multisite, cluster, randomised, controlled trial. The Lancet Psychiatry, 2(6), 503-514.

Switzer, F., & Harper, S. F. (2019). A narrative review of the barriers to the implementation of cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis. Psychosis, 11(2), 151-161.